In The Beginning
CHAPTER 1
Long before a man called Adam walked with God in the gardens of Eden,
longer still before the flood of Noah covered the face of the earth, in a
time called "the beginning," God created the heavens and the earth. A
grand and beautiful design, the earth as conceived by the Creator was an
exquisite home for the creatures He had fashioned. The earth itself was a
magnificent garden where life flourished in a dazzling display of variety.
The ground trembled with the footsteps of the largest creatures (those we
now call dinosaurs). Animals filled the trees, the skies and the oceans.
From eternity God had planned this creation, and it was perfect in every
way. God created men and they began to settle in villages, cities and
nations. Angels, a part of this new creation, were given dominion over the
earth, to rule with the authority of their Creator. It was the archangel
Lucifer who ruled over the nations in all the splendor of the greatest of
God's creations. Every creature fashioned by the hand of God acted in
perfect obedience to the will of their Creator. Angels and men knew God as
a friend and drew their life from Him. There was no sickness or disease,
no hunger or death, for there was no
sin-- |
--Until Lucifer, the closest to the throne of God, the archangel who
"walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire," let the seed of
pride find fertile ground in his heart. Pride led to rebellion, and
rebellion to judgment. Lucifer and the nations following him were placed
under a curse, and the earth itself was judged for their
sin. |
All of this happened before Genesis
1:2. |
Not the Traditional View
Granted, this is not the traditional view of creation. Many may find it
puzzling, perhaps even disturbing. Most of us who have been raised in the
church have accepted the first two chapters of Genesis as a continuous,
uninterrupted account of the origin of the earth and man. After all, many
may argue, doesn't the book of Genesis make it perfectly clear that, in
the beginning, God created the earth as a lifeless, shapeless, chaotic
mass? Isn't it apparent, from the second verse of chapter one, that floods
covered the earth while God's Spirit hovered over what would become a
beautiful new planet? Doesn't Scripture plainly record the six days of
creation and all that was involved in forming the earth during that first
week? |
Before answering any of these questions, it must be made clear that
nothing will be presented in this book that is out of harmony with God's
Word. Every argument will be backed up by biblical evidence, and no new
ideas will be submitted without the support of at least two or three clear
scriptural references. With that in mind, let's take a look at what the
Scriptures have to say about the earth's
origins. |
The Clash With Science
It is generally acknowledged, based on chronologies found in the Old
Testament, that Adam was created about 6,000 years ago, or about 4,000
B.C. Since Darwin published On the Origin of Species in the
mid-1800's, those who have held to a literal interpretation of the Bible
have struggled to counter the claims of science for a creation date
stretching billions of years into the past. Most of the scientific
evidence accumulated during the past century has supported these claims of
an old earth. Some argue that scientists are basing their findings on
previously-held assumptions relating to the earth's antiquity, that they
are merely seeing what they want to see. In other words, they believe the
evolutionary model which requires an earth millions, perhaps billions of
years old, and interpret any evidence they find based on those
assumptions. While there may be some merit to this, the fact remains that
at best it is very difficult to explain much of the scientific evidence
accumulated during the past century in light of a 6,000-year-old
earth. |
Unfortunately, this leaves the Christian with a dilemma. On the one
hand, science claims the earth is billions of years old. On the other
hand, biblical chronologies suggest that the earth is only about 6,000
years old. Faced with this tension between science and faith, the believer
has two alternatives. One must either accept the scientific evidence and
view the biblical creation account as mythology, or be forced to hold fast
to a literal interpretation of the Scriptures and reject what science has
to offer. |
Neither of these alternatives are acceptable. The first violates basic
exegetical principles. Nowhere in Scripture are we led to believe that
either the recorded chronologies or the creation account are myths or
allegories. Both the context and the language itself point to a literal
interpretation. In fact, New Testament writers, inspired by the Holy
Spirit, viewed the creation account as a literal event which took place at
a specific point in history. |
The second alternative requires the believer to "stick his head in the
sand" and ignore the accumulated scientific evidence pointing to an old
earth. As the weight of the evidence grows, the Christian must close his
eyes all the more tightly to keep his faith intact. Not only is this
unacceptable, it is unnecessary, as we'll soon see. Maybe you haven't
thought deeply about the subject because you were afraid that to do so
might shake the foundation upon which your faith is built. Perhaps you've
already been challenged in this area as a Christian in a secular society.
If you're a parent, you may have been forced to wrestle with these issues
as your children grapple with the evolutionary model being taught in our
public schools. |
Challenging the Common Assumption
Whether one accepts the scientific evidence or holds to a literal
interpretation of the Bible, there is one point on which both camps agree:
the Scriptures, literally interpreted, point to a creation date 6,000
years ago. This assumption is taken for granted in the debate between the
two sides. It's accepted without
question. |
We don't agree. The entire premise of this book is that you can take
the Genesis account very literally and not have any difficulty reconciling
faith and science. We're going to challenge assumptions that both
believers and nonbelievers have made for years. This isn't a two-sided
issue, although that's traditionally the way it has been presented. Those
who have sought answers to the question of the earth's origins have been
puzzled by the apparent contradictions. There's a reason for that--a piece
of the puzzle has been missing. Well, perhaps "misplaced" is a better
word. You see, it's been there all along but we haven't known where to
find it. The piece fits between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 and we're going to
take a look at it in the following
chapters. |
Get the book!
With our secure online ordering service, you can order Another
Time...Another Place...Another Man right now! Just click here!
|
What is the gap theory ?
Dansk side
Hvad er gap teorien ? 
Hvad mener jeg med skabelse ? 
Skabelse 
Links
For danske artikler af mig, se:
Skabelse - gap teorien
New Email
Please link to me
The Gap theory blog
Sitemap
goto frontpage The gap theory page
|